Windsor-Clive, Earl of Plymouth and others v Rees and another [2019] EWHC 1008 (Ch)
A widely drafted landlord’s reservation of a right of entry was given a narrow interpretation by the court.
Facts
A farm was let under two agricultural tenancy agreements dating back to the 1960s.
In one of the tenancy agreements, a right was reserved for the landlord (L) as follows:
“Right for the Landlord……to enter on any part of the Farm lands and premises at all reasonable times for all reasonable purposes."
In the other tenancy agreement, a right was reserved for L as follows:
“the Landlord may at any time and at all times during the said tenancy enter upon the said premises…..for the purpose of inspecting the same or for making roads sewers or drains or for any other purpose connected with his estate.”
The farm was part of a site intended for a new garden city outside of Cardiff and applications for outline planning permission had been made for an area including the farm.
L applied for an injunction preventing the tenant (T) from interfering with L’s rights of access. L wanted to undertake a number of surveys from the farm, including a bat habitat survey.
Issue
Did the widely worded reservations in the two tenancy agreements allow for wide rights of access for surveys, inspections and investigations related to the proposed redevelopment of the land?Decision
The phrase “all reasonable purposes” in the first reservation had to be interpreted in the context of a landlord and tenant relationship and did not extend to all reasonable purposes that a landlord may have in mind. It should be construed as a right of entry for inspection and observation purposes, but did not extend to activities which could cause damage to the land or involve cordoning off part of the land or significant interference with the operation of the farm. Digging excavations, sinking boreholes and erecting structures all fell outside of the scope of the reservation.
Similarly, the second reservation did not provide a wider right for L. In particular, the phrase “for any other purpose connected with his estate” referred to activities to be carried out on L’s adjoining land.
Points to note/consider
- Similar reservations to those used in the two tenancy agreements here are fairly typical of agricultural tenancies (particular older ones that pre-date the Agricultural Tenancies Act 1995) and this case could well be cited as a precedent in the future by farming tenants who want to make life awkward for a prospective developer.
- This case is a useful illustration of how a court will interpret a landlord’s reservation in a lease. In particular, a court will strive to preserve the validity of an exception or reservation but will interpret it as restrictively as is necessary to avoid a derogation from grant or a breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment. If it is not possible to construe an exception or reservation in a manner consistent with this ‘irreducible minimum’, it will be struck down. In particular, a widely drafted landlord’s exception or reservation will not give a landlord ‘carte blanche’ to ride roughshod over a tenant’s rights.
Contact
David Harris
Professional Development Lawyer
david.harris@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 934 2019
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Published Article
Family trust disputes: When is a child not a child?
Guide
Challenging a will: What you need to know
Guide
Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975: Common questions
Opinion
Good news for landowners with appeal allowed under the Electronic Communications Code at the Upper Tribunal
Press Release
Browne Jacobson appoints Scott McKittrick as Partner in growing Private Client team
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: Plant based diets, environmental sustainability and the future of farming sustainability
Opinion
Landowner fined £15,000 after public attacked by cows
Legal Update
Polluters to face unlimited penalties under new legislation
Legal Update
BNG update – BNG and tax implications: Government call for evidence
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
Press Release - Firm news
Browne Jacobson's private client team top Chambers High Net Worth Guide rankings again
Browne Jacobson’s private client practice has been ranked as Band One in the 2022 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide for its work in private wealth law.
Legal Update
Conservation Covenants – what are they and how will they affect you?
Legal Update
Wynne-Finch and others v Natural Resources Body for Wales [2021] EWCA Civ 1473
Historic exceptions of mines and minerals did not include mudstone, the common rock of the district.
Published Article
Adverse possession and registered land (Dowse v Bradford MBC)
The Land Registration Act 2002 radically changed the law of adverse possession in relation to registered land.
Legal Update
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Ashloch Ltd and another [2019] UKUT 338 (LC)
The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) could not impose rights under the Electronic Communications Code 2017 where the operator’s expired lease was protected by Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Legal Update
Real estate quarterly update – July to September 2019
The latest real estate update aimed at in house lawyers (and other professionals) practising in the property / real estate sector.
Legal Update
Stanning v Baldwin and another [2019] EWHC 1350 (Ch)
Issues about prescriptive rights of way and drainage arose on the redevelopment of dominant land.
Opinion
The importance of three magic words: subject to contract
A recent case illustrates the importance of ensuring that all emails discussing the terms of a proposed acquisition are headed ‘subject to contract’.
Legal Update
Property quarterly update – April to June 2019
The latest property quarterly update aimed at in house lawyers (and other professionals) practising in the property / real estate sector.
Legal Update
Windsor-Clive, Earl of Plymouth and others v Rees and another [2019] EWHC 1008 (Ch)
A widely drafted landlord’s reservation of a right of entry was given a narrow interpretation by the court.
Legal Update
Legally binding target for net-zero emissions by 2050
Last month the government’s advisory Committee on Climate Change published a report urging the government to commit to cutting greenhouse gases by 100% by 2050 when compared to 1990 emissions (known as net-zero).
Video
The impact of Brexit on environmental law
Brexit has brought with it a great deal of uncertainty for environmental law.
Legal Update
Thorpe v Frank and another [2019] EWCA Civ 150
Repaving of land was sufficient evidence on its own to establish a claim for adverse possession of that land.
Legal Update
O’Byrne Re Land at Tubney, Manor Farm [2018] UKUT 395 (LC) and Roberts v Parker and another [2019] EWCA Civ 121
A couple of cases on the interpretation of easements create no new law, but illustrate a couple of important points.
Legal Update
Oakley and others v Harper McKay Developments Ltd [2018] EWHC 3405 (Ch)
Failing to assign the copyright in plans on or before completion could have meant that a seller’s notice to complete was invalid.
Legal Update
Taurusbuild Ltd and others v McQue and another [2019] UKUT 81 (LC)
The Upper Tribunal turns conventional wisdom on its head by ruling that an easement could be implied into a mortgage of part under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows.
On-Demand
State aid and IP in R&D agreements - hear from our panel of experts
As private businesses, public bodies and universities alike strive to gain a competitive advantage, each increasingly look to each other to develop next generation products and services.
Legal Update
A binding legacy for future landowners: Conservation Covenants
The Government has launched a consultation to consider the introduction of 'Conservation Covenants'.