University animal research workers suffer adverse health effects
The University of Edinburgh has been fined £10,000 for allowing animal research workers to be exposed to laboratory animal allergens “LAA”.
The University of Edinburgh has been fined £10,000 for allowing animal research workers to be exposed to laboratory animal allergens “LAA”.
Two animal research workers have taken the University to court for exposure to LAA which has caused irreversible side effects. The researchers declared that they were allergic to rodents when they started working at the University in 2003. Despite this, they worked with rats and were exposed to LAA during the course of their employment.
The University was found guilty of breaches of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 which requires an employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all their employees whilst they are at work.
The Health and Safety Executive Inspector, Susan Donnelly, has said the University has ‘completely failed to grasp the importance of risk-based health surveillance’.
The University has said that the safety of people on campus is of paramount importance and if there are ever any issues they will work as swiftly as possible to address them.
One of the ways to avoid falling foul of health and safety duties is to conduct risk-based health surveillance to monitor an individual’s fitness for work. This will enable any health conditions to be identified and monitored.
Reviews of health surveillance should be completed at least every 12 months. This should include a review of any known health conditions and the current measures in place that are designed to protect against or prevent any worsening of the health conditions.
As with all health and safety duties the starting point should be an assessment of the risks involved in the work activity to identify the hazards and the appropriate protective and preventative measures.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Settling future claims: Insights from Clifford v IBM 2024
Legal Update
Tobacco and snus use – are insurers asking the right questions?
Legal Update
General election: What a new government could mean for employment law
Opinion - Maternity services
The power of parental touch for babies undergoing painful procedures
Legal Update - Building Safety Act
Case update: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Homes and Communities v Grey GR Limited Partnership
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights Data: Strategies for handling cyber attacks and data breaches
Legal Update
How local authorities can deal with unlawful encampments
Legal Update
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – impact of changes implemented on 4 March 2024
Published Article
English Commercial Court rules against Russian exclusive jurisdiction clauses
Legal Update
AI deep fake fraud exposed - five key lessons and how we need to respond
Legal Update
ICO consultation on accessing care records: A legal perspective
Legal Update
Forest Risk Commodities regulations: Steps food businesses should take
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Opinion
Regulator warning on future dangers of asbestos
Legal Update
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
Legal Update
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Legal Update
UK falls to lowest position for corruption – so what’s going wrong?
Legal Update - Food and drink regulatory update
Food for Thought: Food and drink regulatory update - Autumn 2023
Legal Update
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – what does it mean for my company?
Legal Update
King’s Speech gives the green light for autonomous vehicles
Opinion
What’s lurking in your garden? The UK’s most dangerous and invasive plants
Opinion
Landowner fined £15,000 after public attacked by cows
Legal Update
The future of autonomous technology - August 2023
Legal Update
Polluters to face unlimited penalties under new legislation
Legal Update
Browne Jacobson grows Cardiff team with two new appointments
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Legal Update
Government to expand network and information systems regulations
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Legal Update
UK Government publishes the Online Safety Bill: an overview
Legal Update
Update on the Digital Services Act (“DSA”) – Important Dates and Deadlines Looming
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - January 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Natural England on investigation of ‘first in its kind’ sentenced Devon farmer
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
Opinion
Logistics firm fined for multiple failings leading to asbestos exposure
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined £133,000, after a series of failures which took place whilst excavation work was carried out, exposing its staff to asbestos.
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 2 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Opinion
Directors fined for unsafe removal of asbestos
Two directors of a construction company were fined after failing to ensure the safe removal of asbestos from a plot of land. On 14 and 15 November 2021, Directors Anthony Sumner and Neil Brown, of Waterbarn Limited were involved in the uncontrolled removal of asbestos material from a plot of land in Grasscroft, Oldham.
Opinion
Don't look down
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.
Legal Update
DSA approved: Targeted Advertising Rules explained
Opinion
NHS England – Assuring and supporting complex change
NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.