Is a review of Article 2 application in inquests on the horizon?
The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Jacqueline Maguire v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde in which the Coroner ruled that Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to life) was not engaged.
The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Jacqueline Maguire v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool and Fylde in which the Coroner ruled that Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to life) was not engaged.
Background
The case involved a 52-year-old lady, Jackie Maguire, who lacked the mental capacity to make decisions regarding her health, welfare and living arrangements. Jackie had lived in a residential care home since 1993 and was subject to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. On 22 February 2017, Jackie died from a perforated gastric ulcer after becoming ill two days before. It was alleged that there were a number of failures to provide Jackie with basic medical attention by those responsible for her care.
Case History
At the inquest into Jackie’s death, the Coroner ruled that Article 2 of the ECHR had not been engaged after considering the case of R (Parkinson) v HM Senior Coroner for Kent. The reasons for this decision were that the allegations against Jackie’s carers were those of individual negligence which Parkinson confirmed fell outside the scope of Article 2.
This outcome was challenged by Jackie’s mother who brought a Judicial Review on the basis that the Coroner had been wrong to reach the conclusion that Article 2 did not apply. This application was dismissed. Jackie’s mother subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal with the appeal also being dismissed.
An application was made to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal and this was granted on 23 February 2022.
Significance
The application of Article 2 remains an area that is frequently encountered during coronial proceedings and whilst we do not have full details of this appeal yet, there is the possibility that this could be a significant decision in relation to that application.
The appeal has not yet been listed and we will report further on this case in due course.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Duty of candour and patient safety incidents: Proposed amendments to CQC Regulations
In Person Event
Claims Club: Birmingham
In Person Event
Claims Club: London
Legal Update
Building an inclusive workplace: strategies for attracting and retaining disabled talent
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Have your say on the 10 Year Health Plan for England
On-Demand
Kinship care: DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG
Legal Update
Roundtable report: Community engagement in high street regeneration
Legal Update - Maternity services
MNSI annual report 2023/24: Key insights and future ambitions for maternity safety
Opinion
New Mental Health Bill to be introduced in Parliament
Opinion - Maternity services
Enhancing care for women with ectopic pregnancies: Insights from MBRRACE-UK
Guide
Guide to inquests for mental health patients
Legal Update
Ozempic: The rising costs and coverage issues of weight loss medication
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
Labour’s employment law reforms: Employment Rights Bill unveiled
Legal Update
ABC pilot: Improving maternity safety to prevent brain injuries in childbirth
Legal Update - Maternity services
DISCERN study published: How to improve discussions with families when things go wrong in maternity care
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to provide legal services to public bodies across UK after appointment on inaugural YPO framework
Legal Update
Balancing acts: Navigating the complex risks in adult social care provision
Opinion
Lord Darzi’s report on the NHS in England and the future of mental health care
Press Release
Browne Jacobson launches new HR services offering in health and social care
Legal Update
Employment Healthcare Briefing: October 2024
Legal Update
What does the Supreme Court decision in Tesco v USDAW mean for NHS employers?
Legal Update
Hybrid working, the right to flexible working and how to make it work for public sector employers
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Decisions of the Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel
Legal Update
Strike breakthrough: Junior doctors agree to pay deal, ending prolonged industrial action
Legal Update
Death certification reform in England and Wales: How will health and social care be affected?
Legal Update
A balancing act: Navigating between positive action and discrimination in the workplace
Online Event - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Complex medical treatment decisions for patients with mental disorder
Legal Update
CQC publish National review of maternity services in England
Legal Update
World Patient Safety Day 2024: “Improving diagnosis for patient safety”
Legal Update
Relying on parental consent for treatment and restraint against a child's wishes
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to provide legal advice to North West public bodies after contract award
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Insights from the Chief Coroner of England and Wales
Legal Update
A long period of voluntary child care does not always mean an entitlement to damages
Legal Update
Extended s20 voluntary care isn’t always a breach of human rights
Legal Update
Mitigating the £6.2bn black hole: Are councils maximising these resources well enough?
Press Release - #PositivePurpose
Strolll: HealthTech for rehabilitation
Legal Update
Implementing green leases: Enhancing sustainability in NHS properties
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act 2023: Light Touch Regime
Press Release
Browne Jacobson contributes to report promoting greater UAE-UK collaboration in cancer care
