In our series of articles we consider some of the key risks that parties will want to manage as PFI contracts move towards expiry.
This article in particular focuses on the management of party relationships.
When a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contract expires, the assets are handed back to the contracting authority. As of September 2023, in the UK there are still over 550 operational PFI schemes and the majority of these schemes are due to expire within the next 15 years. As the duration of a PFI contract is usually for a considerable period (around 15 to 30 years), the hand back process can be time consuming, technical and costly. Due to this, there is a risk that relationships between the contracting parties break down which can unfortunately result in increased disputes.
This note is intended to discuss the importance of managing relationships in a PFI contract and mitigating the risk of a breakdown in relations.
The importance of maintaining a commercial relationship between the parties
As with any contract, it is important to maintain the commercial relationship between the parties. However, this is particularly important with PFI contracts, which are often referred to as ‘relational contracts’, due to their long-term nature and reliance upon trust between the parties.
Positive relationships between parties is critical to ensuring that projects are managed effectively in the long term and deliver value for the public sector. PFI contracts involve a considerable amount of risk and costs and the relationship between the parties can put great weight on the deliverables and outputs.
A collaborative relationship between parties offers flexibility and trust and whilst this is recommended by the White Fraiser Report (20 July 2023), it can often be hard to achieve. In situations where a breakdown of the commercial relationship arises, there are significant consequences for both the project and parties involved.
Steps you can take to maintain relationships
Regular and open communication:
- Contracts will often provide for liaison processes which can be a helpful forum for identifying issues.
- Where the contract does not contain liaison provisions, the parties should develop a communication strategy.
Familiarise yourself with the contract and discuss any gaps/uncertainties:
- It is not unusual for PFI contracts to be silent in certain circumstances and many PFI contracts which were signed prior to the development of standard forms contain very little detail around the process and requirements that apply upon hand back/expiry.
- Parties should seek to obtain a complete copy of the contract, including any variations. Where variations have been agreed but not documented, parties should consider whether it would be beneficial to prepare and agree a conformed copy of the contract.
Establish a process for early identification of disputes:
- Having early discussions at the right level can ‘unlock’ certain disagreements between parties or establish a process for escalation without referring to potentially time consuming and costly formal dispute processes/proceedings.
- Parties could consider agreeing terms for a dispute avoidance mechanism.
What happens if there is a breakdown in the commercial relationship
It is important to recognise that a break down in the parties’ relationship may not just occur as a PFI contract approaches its expiry - although the hand back process that occurs towards the expiry of a PFI contract can be a heavily contested area.
If relations start to break down between the parties, early identification and escalation should be focused upon utilising the approaches we outline above. Parties should avoid ‘saving up’ disputes until the end of the contract as the hand back process is time limited and resource intensive.
If the parties do encounter a dispute, the contract itself will typically contain a provision for dispute resolution. For example, the parties may have to engage in a form of ADR such as mediation or arbitration. Parties can also consider terminating the contract but this can be a complex process and may have significant implications for either party. For various reasons, dispute resolution or indeed avoidance may be the best approach.
Before proceeding with any course of action regarding a PFI dispute we would recommend that you seek independent legal advice from the outset. If you would like further advice regarding a PFI contract or if you are involved in a PFI dispute, please do not hesitate to contact us.
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Employment Rights Bill: Will it cost more to outsource public services and back-office functions?
Guide - PFI expiry
PFI expiry guidance for schools
Legal Update
Know your dispute resolution clauses: Key take-aways from Kajima v Children’s Ark and Lancashire Schools v Lendlease
Press Release
Browne Jacobson and CBI roundtable explores how to finance public infrastructure post-PFI
Press Release
King’s Speech 2024: Reaction from Browne Jacobson lawyers
Legal Update - PFI expiry
A first of many? PFI company seeks Restructuring Plan
Legal Update - PFI expiry
Managing PFI contract expiry and maintaining party relationships
Legal Update - PFI expiry
PFI handback: ‘Handback Condition’ limitations, disputes and solutions
Legal Update
2024: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update - PFI expiry
Managing the expiry of PFI contracts
Legal Update - PFI expiry
PFI expiry - hope for the best, plan for the worst?
Legal Update
What are we to do about self reporting in PFI contracts?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise London borough councils on key social infrastructure PFI deal for streetlighting in Croydon and Lewisham
Legal Update
Higher education projects – the end is nigh?
Published Article
How the Environment Act affects existing contracts’
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Bromley Council on the first social housing initiative of its kind to tackle homelessness
Published Article
The role of Legal Project Management in public sector projects
The concept of Legal Project Management (“LPM”) is increasingly relevant to the delivery of legal services, both in-house functions and private practice law. This is unsurprising, LPM is crucial if lawyers are to add value by controlling budgets, communicate pro-actively on risk mitigation and costs, and manage time by resourcing to deal with pinch points in the project.
Legal Update
Regeneration funding: Securing Compulsory Purchase Orders in the face of escalating building costs
The focus on the Levelling Up agenda and the availability of grant funding, means there are numerous important regeneration schemes actively being pursued across the country. With ever-escalating project and building costs, in many cases, applications that were made for grant funding were based on costs contingencies that have already been exceeded.
Legal Update - PFI expiry
The impending termination of PFI contracts and what should be done now
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s government & infrastructure lawyers advise on first South West based green hydrogen production project
Browne Jacobson’s specialist government and infrastructure team have advised Canford Renewable Energy Ltd on the delivery of its Dorset Green H2 facility.
Guide
2022: Horizon scanning in construction
Published Article
Construction needs to do more to reduce carbon emissions
More needs to be made of these procurement routes, with clients honouring the original concept rather than watering down concepts.
Legal Update
Waste is only waste if we waste it*
This article looks at the impact of Part 3 of the Environment Act 2021 on waste collection authorities, including measures to reduce packaging waste, to encourage re-use and recycling and changes to the way waste will be collected.