Kinship care: DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG
Welcome to this recorded discussion between Steven Ford KC and Sarah Erwin-Jones, Partner at Browne Jacobson.
Sarah and Steven delve into a landmark decision that has significant implications for local authorities, insurers, and kinship carers across the UK. The Court of Appeal's recent judgment in the case of DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG has set a precedent, expanding the boundaries of vicarious liability for local authorities in certain circumstances involving kinship carers.
Our presenters explore the details of the case, where the Claimant, placed with his maternal aunt and uncle by the local authority, later alleged abuse in their care. The Court of Appeal's decision marks a pivotal moment in the legal landscape, establishing that local authorities may indeed be vicariously liable for the actions of kinship foster carers and relatives under certain conditions.
This discussion guides us through the complexities of this judgment, comparing it with the established law, particularly referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council. Our hosts will dissect the reasoning behind the Court of Appeal's conclusion, emphasising the importance of the local authority's role in the assessment and approval of the kinship foster carers, and how this relationship can lead to vicarious liability.
Our speakers will address the broader implications of this judgment for local authorities, kinship carers, the children placed in their care, and insurance risks. They will discuss the challenges and considerations that arise from this decision, including the impact on social care practices and the potential for 'defensive' practices that may not always serve the best interests of children.
This session is an invaluable resource for legal professionals, social workers, local authorities, insurers, and anyone involved in the care and protection of children. Join us as we navigate through this significant legal development, understand its implications, and consider the path forward in the realm of kinship care and local authority responsibility.
Contact
Sarah Erwin-Jones
Partner
Sarah.Erwin-Jones@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6136
You may be interested in...
On-Demand
Kinship care: DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG
Legal Update
Vicarious liability for kinship foster carer abuse: Implications for local authority insurers
Legal Update
Relying on parental consent for treatment and restraint against a child's wishes
Legal Update
A long period of voluntary child care does not always mean an entitlement to damages
Legal Update
Extended s20 voluntary care isn’t always a breach of human rights
Legal Update
Mitigating the £6.2bn black hole: Are councils maximising these resources well enough?
Legal Update
Court of Appeal extends local authority liability for kinship foster carers
Legal Update
Redress and reparation schemes: Where the complexity is not about quantum
Legal Update
What does the new gender questioning guidance mean for schools?
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Giving evidence before the Family Court - a practical session
Legal Update
HXA and YXA : Guidance from the Supreme Court on negligence in failure to remove cases
On-Demand - Shared Insights
The challenges caused by disordered eating in education, health and social care settings
Opinion
Parental alienation a tool for domestic abuse?
Legal Update
Public Consultation on a Mandatory Reporting Regime for Child Sexual Abuse
Legal Update
Vicarious liability – don’t overlook the importance of close connection
Legal Update
HXA and YXA failure to remove cases: Key considerations in anticipation of the Supreme Court judgment
Legal Update
Protecting children and their data in the online environment
Opinion
Challenges from potential Foster Carers and Adopters
Our immediate future shows a renewed focus on foster care. We’re going to see a new nationwide-drive to recruit foster carers and the implementation of a more robust, and potentially financially-generous system for encouraging friends and family to care for their relatives (both when extended families cannot cope or provide care for any reason).
Legal Update
Independent review of children’s social care – focus on foster care
This summer saw the publication of a report describing itself as a ‘once in a generation’ opportunity to reset children social care. Based on the current trajectory, the report concluded that 100,000 children would be held in care in the next decade.
Published Article
Complex safeguarding allegations
Whilst Schools and Academies exist to educate and inspire young people, their primary obligation is their protection. Keeping Children Safe in Education (“KCSIE”) is at the heart of everything that educational institutions do and impacts on every decision, however big or small.
On-Demand
'Barry Bennell case' webinar
This webinar looks at the three key themes in the decision, and is aimed at sports & social clubs (including safeguarding officers).
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding Forum. Child Safeguarding in childcare proceedings
Published Article
Do local authorities owe a duty of care to children living at home with their family?
On-Demand
Child Abuse & Social Care Forum
Watch now on-demand our Child Abuse & Social Care Forum.
Published Article
KCSIE: How to research applicants' online profiles
The Department for Education published the draft 2022 version of Keeping Children Safe in Education. A few changes caught the eye and the one that most of us in education are discussing relates to a new set of text that suggested checking the online presence of job applicants.
Press Release
High Court strikes out ‘failure to remove’ Human Right Act claim against two local authorities
The High Court has considered the application of the Human Right Act to local authorities in cases where they are carrying out their statutory child protection functions after dismissing the latest ‘failure to remove’ claim against two local authorities.
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Preparing for 2022 – the big issues for legal teams across health and social care
On-Demand
Children's Trust webinar: Rebuilding Children's Services
In this session, we look at how to manage and respond to current challenges, including interventions, service failures and serious incidents, and consider future models for long term transformation of services.
Press Release
Court delivers key ruling on a local authority’s duty of care in ‘Failure to Remove’ negligence claims
Legal Update
Settled law on failure to remove negligence claims: does section 20 of the Children Act 1989 create a lasting duty of care?
The judgment in YXA v Wolverhampton City Council [2021] is significant for several reasons.
On-Demand
Children's social care forum
Catch up on this year’s social care forum where we discussed developments on liability for friends and family foster placements, lessons learned from pursuing recoveries from abusers in child sex abuse cases and also the impact of the ABI Code of Practice for responding to civil claims for child sexual abuse following recommendations of the IICSA.
Legal Update
Children’s social care review – Case for Change – a step towards consensus?
The Independent review of children’s social care in England describes itself as a ‘once in a generation opportunity to transform the children’s social care system’. Some might also see it as a poisoned chalice.
Legal Update
More guidance on failure to remove claims: what are the implications for children's services and SAR teams?
Local authorities now have the benefit of a flurry of recent judgments on the issue of the existence of a duty of care in children’s ‘failure to remove’ cases.
On-Demand
Post-Covid child abuse litigation - a new future
Legal Update
The importance of evidence when it comes justifying indirect discrimination
The High Court decision of R (Cornerstone (North East) Adoption and Fostering Service Ltd) v The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills highlight the critical role that evidence plays in the Court’s assessment.
Opinion
COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far
In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.
Legal Update
Vicarious liability - when is the role of an Independent Contractor sufficiently “akin to employment”
The beginning of Spring 2020 saw the Supreme Court give judgment in two important cases concerning the principle of vicarious liability.
Legal Update
The Coronavirus Bill – Social Care implications
The Delay phase of the Government’s coronavirus response plan anticipated a need to take steps to support health and social care systems, including steps to preserve essential services by reducing some others.
Legal Update
Historical child abuse and limitation – check your public liability policies
Last week the Court of Appeal handed down a decision that has significant implications for all those organisations that may face historical abuse claims.
Legal Update
What we have learned about costs claims in child abuse cases
The Courts are slowly accepting that these cases are very much now in the mainstream of litigation, they still do have their quirks which many judges consider separate them from the pool of general personal injury litigation.