Organisations working with children know safeguarding is a priority, but too many are still blindsided by revelations of abuse.
Legal obligations are often engaged, and there are strong moral and organisational reasons to meet and exceed these. By doing so, organisations can promote early identification of concerns, effective investigation, and appropriate remediation. This minimises impact to an organisation and, most importantly, harm to others.
In this note, we have drawn together key considerations to plan for and deliver an effective timely response to emerging concerns.
Who knew?
The #TheyKnew campaign is crowdfunding to seek justice through the courts for victims of child sexual abuse and exploitation. This reflects two common questions after a scandal: 'Who knew?' and 'Who will be accountable?'
Candour and cooperation
Candour is mandated in an increasing number of areas, through legislation and regulators, with sanctions for non-compliance. The anticipated Hillsborough Law will expand this further. Where not mandated, failure to demonstrate candour following an organisational failing can lead to significant harm in areas such as reputation and recruitment, impacting an organisation’s ability to pursue its business.
First to know
Legal obligations or legal action should not be the first prompt for investigation. Investment in culture, systems and investigation creates an opportunity to reduce or avoid harm; support justice and remediation; and contain the impact on an organisation and its people.
Speak up culture
Staff in delivery teams are typically best placed to identify concerns. New staff may offer fresh perspectives. Staff at all levels and of all experience need to be engaged in an effective 'speak up' culture. This requires clear routes and protections for whistleblowing, emphasis on the value of speaking up whenever concerns arise, and commitment to acting on reports.
Escalation and coordination
Effective escalation and coordination processes ensure concerns do not get 'stuck' within local teams and that trends can be identified. Barriers can include such things as performance systems that penalise identification of concerns, and inconsistent reporting systems.
Investigation
A 'speak up' culture should not require a high evidential barrier for a report, so effective informal and formal investigation processes are needed. Staff should understand investigation does not equate to blame but is about best practice for all. Clear division is needed between informal investigation and formal investigation, where disciplinary or regulatory consequences may arise.
Where evidence emerges of very serious or wide-ranging harm, early consideration should be given to a bespoke investigation format with terms of reference, a transparency strategy, and possible independent investigator. In relation to public bodies, a locally led inquiry may be appropriate.
In all cases, thought must be given to any possible regulatory, police or coroner investigation, with coordination to ensure these processes are properly supported.
Notifications
Insurers, regulators, customers, relevant office holders, boards and others may need to be informed. Clear understanding of thresholds for notification is important and may require guidance or engagement with relevant third parties. It is best to establish thresholds as part of planning work, rather than after the event.
Information sharing
Organisations may have a duty or power or otherwise wish to share information, such as with DBS or another known employer of an individual. This is generally possible for safeguarding purposes, but the detail is important. The ICO has guidance here:
A 10 step guide to sharing information to safeguard children
Risk reduction and remediation
Early identification of risk can support early actions to reduce risk or remediate harm which has occurred. Proactive consideration or remediation, where relevant, can support early intervention and better outcomes.
How can we help?
With experts in HR, employment, investigations, inquiries, data, redress, we regularly support clients through the most complex and challenging of incidents.
Contact

James Arrowsmith
Partner
james.arrowsmith@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0) 330 045 2321
You may be interested in
Legal Update
Safeguarding children: Effective strategies for prevention and response
Legal Update
Navigating the complexities of deprivation of liberty for children under 16
Legal Update
Limitation in claims for Child Sexual abuse (CSA)
Press Release
New reforms affecting child sexual abuse claims: Legal comment
Legal Update
Limitation reform in sexual abuse claims: How this affects sports clubs
Opinion
Supporting social work decisions: R (on behalf of TW) v Essex County Council
On-Demand
Pupillage open evening
Legal Update
Calls for public inquiry into child sexual exploitation intensify amidst political pressure
Legal Update
The latest take on vicarious liability for kinship / connected person foster care
Opinion
Opportunities for private children’s services to engage with Regional Care Cooperatives
On-Demand
Kinship care: DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG
Legal Update
Vicarious liability for kinship foster carer abuse: Implications for local authority insurers
Legal Update
Relying on parental consent for treatment and restraint against a child's wishes
Legal Update
A long period of voluntary child care does not always mean an entitlement to damages
Legal Update
Extended s20 voluntary care isn’t always a breach of human rights
Legal Update
Mitigating the £6.2bn black hole: Are councils maximising these resources well enough?
Legal Update
Court of Appeal extends local authority liability for kinship foster carers
Legal Update
Redress and reparation schemes: Where the complexity is not about quantum
Legal Update
What does the new gender questioning guidance mean for schools?
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Giving evidence before the Family Court - a practical session
Legal Update
HXA and YXA : Guidance from the Supreme Court on negligence in failure to remove cases
On-Demand - Shared Insights
The challenges caused by disordered eating in education, health and social care settings
Opinion
Parental alienation a tool for domestic abuse?
Legal Update
Public Consultation on a Mandatory Reporting Regime for Child Sexual Abuse
Legal Update
Vicarious liability – don’t overlook the importance of close connection
Legal Update
HXA and YXA failure to remove cases: Key considerations in anticipation of the Supreme Court judgment
Legal Update
Protecting children and their data in the online environment
Opinion
Challenges from potential Foster Carers and Adopters
Our immediate future shows a renewed focus on foster care. We’re going to see a new nationwide-drive to recruit foster carers and the implementation of a more robust, and potentially financially-generous system for encouraging friends and family to care for their relatives (both when extended families cannot cope or provide care for any reason).
Legal Update
Independent review of children’s social care – focus on foster care
This summer saw the publication of a report describing itself as a ‘once in a generation’ opportunity to reset children social care. Based on the current trajectory, the report concluded that 100,000 children would be held in care in the next decade.
Published Article
Complex safeguarding allegations
Whilst Schools and Academies exist to educate and inspire young people, their primary obligation is their protection. Keeping Children Safe in Education (“KCSIE”) is at the heart of everything that educational institutions do and impacts on every decision, however big or small.
On-Demand
'Barry Bennell case' webinar
This webinar looks at the three key themes in the decision, and is aimed at sports & social clubs (including safeguarding officers).
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Safeguarding Forum. Child Safeguarding in childcare proceedings
Published Article
Do local authorities owe a duty of care to children living at home with their family?
On-Demand
Child Abuse & Social Care Forum
Watch now on-demand our Child Abuse & Social Care Forum.
Published Article
KCSIE: How to research applicants' online profiles
The Department for Education published the draft 2022 version of Keeping Children Safe in Education. A few changes caught the eye and the one that most of us in education are discussing relates to a new set of text that suggested checking the online presence of job applicants.
Press Release
High Court strikes out ‘failure to remove’ Human Right Act claim against two local authorities
The High Court has considered the application of the Human Right Act to local authorities in cases where they are carrying out their statutory child protection functions after dismissing the latest ‘failure to remove’ claim against two local authorities.
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Preparing for 2022 – the big issues for legal teams across health and social care
On-Demand
Children's Trust webinar: Rebuilding Children's Services
In this session, we look at how to manage and respond to current challenges, including interventions, service failures and serious incidents, and consider future models for long term transformation of services.
Press Release
Court delivers key ruling on a local authority’s duty of care in ‘Failure to Remove’ negligence claims
Legal Update
Settled law on failure to remove negligence claims: does section 20 of the Children Act 1989 create a lasting duty of care?
The judgment in YXA v Wolverhampton City Council [2021] is significant for several reasons.