Mind the GAP - FCA warning to GAP insurers
Motor insurers have been warned by the FCA that they have three months to improve the value they give customers in products that top up coverage or face potential sanctions. Matt Brewis, the FCA’s Director of insurance, has said:
“If the firms are unable to prove they’re providing fair value to their customers, they should expect further action from the regulator.”
On 20 September 2023 the FCA published its latest Insurance Value Measures Data (January to December 2022), which revealed concerns over whether products are providing fair value to customers. Products highlighted include Guaranteed Asset Protection Insurance (GAP) and Excess Protection (for Motor Insurance).
According to FCA data, for GAP ads-on products only 4% of premium payments were ultimately paid out in claims for standalone GAP products the figure was slightly higher, but still only 7%. GAP motor insurance covers the difference between a vehicle’s purchase value and its current market value. It does not usually pay back the vehicle’s original value at purchase or the remaining finance value (if the vehicle was bought on finance). For Excess Protection (for Motor Insurance) only 15% of the amount customers pay in premiums is currently paid out in claims. (General insurance value measures data 2022)
The FCA’s consumer duty came into force in July 2023, setting a higher standard for consumer protection and requiring firms to act to deliver good value for consumers. Firms must deliver and assess four outcomes under the Consumer Duty, including price and value. Fair value assessments must be undertaken to demonstrate that a price a consumer pays for a product or service is reasonable compared it’s the overall benefits.
Also on 20 September 2023, the FCA sent a series of “Dear CEO” letters highlighting its priorities for Retail Insurance, Wholesale Insurance, Life Insurance and Funeral Plans. The focus of this article is on Retail Insurance letter.
Urgent action needed
For insurers of GAP and excess protection products, urgent action is required to review the value provided by such products (including an assessment of the distribution chain and the charges applied by others involved in the sale of these products) and make any amendments required to ensure customers receive fair value.
Contents
- The Word, September 2023
- Death and disgrace policies: What can insurers learn from the allegations against Russell Brand?
- Extreme weather leading to a rise in property claims
- The RAAC crisis: Is it really back-to-school this September?
- A new digital safe space – How does the EU Digital Services Act affect insurers?
- Insurance and the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018
- CyberCube’s Global Threat Outlook: The evolving threat of cyber operations
- “TOBA traps” - general exposure risk under existing TOBAs
- Making numbers easy - complying with the Customer Understanding objective
Key contact
Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Walking the fine line: The statutory duty of candour and insurance
Legal Update
FCA launches consultation on broker remuneration for multi-occupancy buildings insurance
Legal Update
AI is creating fraudulent claims
Legal Update
Shoplifting epidemic by organised criminal gangs: The impact for insurers
Legal Update
Death and disgrace policies: What can insurers learn about the allegations against Gregg Wallace?
Legal Update
Insurance complaints surge continues
Legal Update
The ‘grate’ cheese robbery: Implications for insurance professionals
Legal Update
Environmental crime and the impact for insurers
Legal Update
What might a Trump victory mean for the UK insurance industry?
Legal Update
Post Office scandal: Lessons for underwriters
Legal Update
Weather protection parametric insurance: A sign of things to come?
Legal Update
Updates to the UK’s Arbitration Bill
Legal Update
Ozempic: The rising costs and coverage issues of weight loss medication
Legal Update
ICAEW: Changes to PII requirements
Legal Update
Contractor insolvency: Peabody Trust v NHBC
Legal Update
By a narrow 2 to 1 majority, the Court of Appeal finds in favour of insurers in the construction of an exclusion clause in a W&I policy
Legal Update
LMA binders’ consultation
Legal Update
Smooth sailing ahead: The LMA's new Open Form Default Clause
Legal Update
PFAS: The issue that won’t go away
Legal Update
Oklahoma earthquake: Racial discrimination in adjudication
Legal Update
Vicarious liability for kinship foster carer abuse: Implications for local authority insurers
Legal Update
Latest short-term insurance trends
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, August 2024
Legal Update
Words matter: Another case on the importance of accurate drafting
Legal Update
London Fire Brigade to stop attending for automatic fire alarms: Implications for insurers
Legal Update
Navigating Oil Price Cap legislation: LMA issues revised Cargo and Hull wordings
Legal Update
It’s not cricket: Insurers change their mind about jurisdiction
Legal Update
Multi-occupancy building insurance: Latest tribunal decision
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, June 2024
Legal Update - Consumer Duty
Updated UK Consumer Wordings Guidance: Browne Jacobson collaborates with the LMA
Legal Update - Consumer Duty
From products to protection: The rise of embedded insurance
Legal Update
The European Accessibility Act: Inclusive products and services
Legal Update
Final FCA anti-greenwashing rule guidance published
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, May 2024
Legal Update
The Baltimore bridge collapse: One of the biggest losses in maritime insurance history?
Legal Update
The space data revolution
Legal Update
New guidance on supporting autistic customers for the insurance industry
Legal Update
Chubb ordered to indemnify SXSW for Covid cancellation
Legal Update - The Word
The Word, March 2024
