Duty to defend - when is it triggered?
In the recent case of Main St Am Assurance Co v Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, the New York appeal court considered when a duty to defend was triggered under a policy wording.
The facts
The case concerned an injury to a sub-contractor on a construction project. The sub-contractor benefitted from insurance that had been taken out with the Defendant.
The policy included cover for ‘liability for bodily injury…caused in whole or in part by the [policyholder’s] acts or omissions’. However, the claim against the contractor alleged violation of labor laws, but not negligence. Accordingly, insurers argued they had no duty to defend the claim as it did not satisfy the policy’s insuring clause.
Decision
The court adopted a purposive approach and held that insurers were obliged to defend the claim. In reaching that decision, the court held that the insurer’s duty to defend would be triggered if the complaint suggests a “reasonable possibility” that the claims may fall within the scope of the policy. Even though the underlying complaint did not specifically allege negligence, it did suggest a reasonable possibility that negligence was a proximate cause of the sub-contractor’s injuries, thereby potentially bringing the claim within the ambit of policy.
Accordingly, the court held that insurers did have a duty to defend the contractor, despite the fact the complaint did not actually allege that the subcontractor had been negligent.
This decision confirms that the court may take a purposive approach when considering an insurer’s duty to defend, rather than strictly following the pleaded cause of action.
Contents
- The Word, November 2022
- An update on articles in previous editions of the Word
- ‘You get what you pay for’ – the meaning of ‘professional services’ in D&C policies
- ‘Final judgment’ or ‘final adjudication’ - what’s the difference?
- Atlanta adopts Plain Numbers to improve policy readability
- Date of incident or date of coverage decision – when does the cause of action commence?
Contact
Tim Johnson
Partner
tim.johnson@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)115 976 6557
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Walking the fine line: The statutory duty of candour and insurance
Legal Update
FCA launches consultation on broker remuneration for multi-occupancy buildings insurance
Legal Update
AI is creating fraudulent claims
Legal Update
Shoplifting epidemic by organised criminal gangs: The impact for insurers
Legal Update
Death and disgrace policies: What can insurers learn about the allegations against Gregg Wallace?
Legal Update
Insurance complaints surge continues
Legal Update
Embedding social value in procurement
Legal Update
Navigating workplace sexual harassment laws during the festive season
Opinion
Revolutionising the Workforce: Impact of Get Britain Working White Paper
Legal Update - London Market Quarterly
London Market Quarterly December 2024: An eye on what the market needs to know
Published Article
Johnson et al v FirstRand Bank: Judgment sends warning across financial services intermediation
Opinion
Balancing employer flexibility and employee rights
Legal Update
The ‘grate’ cheese robbery: Implications for insurance professionals
Legal Update
Environmental crime and the impact for insurers
Legal Update
Carbon fraud prompts insurance response
Legal Update
What might a Trump victory mean for the UK insurance industry?
Legal Update
Post Office scandal: Lessons for underwriters
Legal Update
Weather protection parametric insurance: A sign of things to come?
Legal Update
Building an inclusive workplace: Strategies for attracting and retaining disabled talent
On-Demand
Kinship care: DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG
Legal Update
After a pause, Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) regulation becomes one step closer
Legal Update
Updates to the UK’s Arbitration Bill
Legal Update
Ozempic: The rising costs and coverage issues of weight loss medication
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
What does the Employment Rights Bill mean for employment practices liability insurance?
Legal Update
ICAEW: Changes to PII requirements
Legal Update
Contractor insolvency: Peabody Trust v NHBC
Legal Update
Insurability by design: Increased transparency for vehicle manufacturers and insurers
Legal Update
By a narrow 2 to 1 majority, the Court of Appeal finds in favour of insurers in the construction of an exclusion clause in a W&I policy
Legal Update
Organisational approaches to ESG and sustainability matters
Legal Update
LMA binders’ consultation
Legal Update
Smooth sailing ahead: The LMA's new Open Form Default Clause
Legal Update
PFAS: The issue that won’t go away
Legal Update
Oklahoma earthquake: Racial discrimination in adjudication
Legal Update
Will the Online Safety Act help reduce Google ad spoofing in insurance?
Legal Update
Vicarious liability for kinship foster carer abuse: Implications for local authority insurers
Legal Update
Latest short-term insurance trends
Legal Update
Motor finance complaints on hold: Why now is the time for strategic action
Published Article
General insurance claims part 3: evidence of the insurance markets’ learnings from the consumer duty
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence putting the ‘actuarial defence’ to the test?
