We’re pleased to publish the results of our annual Teacher Pay Survey, which now encompasses support staff pay.
This is our third year of capturing and understanding what trusts intend to do in relation to national decisions on staff pay. We’re pleased to have received over 100 responses, representing trusts from all regions of the country, providing a strong dataset to provide valuable insight.
Valuable insight
Although academies do not need to follow nationally agreed terms and conditions, including pay, results show that the majority are doing so, predominantly it would seem, to aid recruitment and retention.
However, there is a greater degree of variance for support staff with a greater number of trusts moving away from the NJC Green Book pay increase, citing a lack of financial control and desire for greater flexibility.
The Pay Survey 2023 closed on 30 November 2023 and 103 respondents took part, representing trusts from across all regions of the country. The survey did not require a forced response to each question.
Introduction
This is our third year of capturing and understanding what trusts intend to do in relation to national decisions on teacher pay and this year we are pleased to have added questions about support staff pay to our annual salary. We are delighted that over 100 responses were received (up from the 79 received last year), indicating that it is clearly a subject of interest.
30% of responses came from multi academy trusts of between 6 and 10 academies, with single academies also being large in number (24%), with the majority of trusts having mixed education phases.
Analysis
Although academies do not need to follow nationally agreed terms and conditions, including pay, it is clear that most are continuing to do so. This may be due to the size of the organisations who responded to our survey (i.e., smaller trusts compared to larger trusts).
In relation to the implementation of STPCD 2023, the vast majority (99%) are increasing pay in line with the recommendations, which was similar to the position in last year’s survey. This was also the position in 2021.
Interestingly, 1% of respondents (one trust) this year intend to increase pay, but below the STPCD recommendation.
Like last year, the results this year suggest there is little interest in departing from the national pay scales and increases for trusts to create their own teacher pay scale. The majority of respondents stated that the reason for this is that they wanted to continue to follow STPCD recommendations (84%). Another reason is the ability to be able to recruit talent competitively (51%), indicating that paying national rates of pay is likely to ensure this.
Automatic pay progression
Similarly, there is little change with regards to moving towards automatic pay progression. In 2022, 60.53% of respondents linked pay to performance compared to an increase of 66% of respondents this year. However, there was also an increase in those planning to change to automatic pay progression from last year (9.21% in 2022 and 11% in 2023). 90% of respondents said they will continue to follow STPCD pay ranges and have no plans to create their own pay scale which is a reduction of 2% compared to last year. So perhaps there is an emerging trend to make some changes.
There are also some interesting comments captured in the survey, including one comment where the Main Pay Range has been split into half points so that they can be more flexible with progression.
Support staff
In relation to support staff, the results show that 89% of respondents still adopt the NJC Green Book pay scale for support staff, with 11% having moved away from NJC.
Of note is the difference between the total number of respondents who applied the STPCD pay increase for teachers in full this year, at 99%, against the NJC pay increase for support staff, which was much lower at 88%.
9% of trusts either applied for a lower overall increase to support staff pay this year or remained undecided at the time of completing the survey with regards to what they intended to do. Commentary and insights from trusts highlight, that considerations around overall affordability is impacting the sector here. However, it is noted that 3% of the trusts who responded applied an increase to support staff pay above that of the NJC increase this year.
These results are indicative of the complex factors influencing decisions around support staff pay in the sector. The survey results show that a larger proportion of trusts have already moved away from NJC pay for support staff, at 11%, as opposed to STPCD for teachers, at 5%.
Greater financial control
Commentary to the survey suggests that factors around having greater financial control are an important consideration, at 18%, but so too are wider factors around the design of pay scales across trusts. Of note is commentary around the lack of flexibility within the NJC pay scale to accommodate senior and executive support staff roles within trusts, with some respondents looking to add additional pay points to their existing
pay scales or design a new pay scale to address this need. 14% of the responses about potentially moving away from the NJC pay scale were associated with the need for greater flexibility.
Other factors highlighted by the survey relate to considerations for multi-county trusts and trusts with out of county growth plans owing to the nature of local collective bargaining and pay scale design across NJC support staff pay. Of the respondents thinking of moving away from NJC pay for support staff, 22% say this relates to considerations around equal pay, with commentary suggesting that some trusts are experiencing challenges with the design, application and management of support staff pay across the trust where multiple pay scales exist (presumably inherited local authority grading structures).
On a final point here is commentary to suggest some trusts are considering the impact of inequality between teaching pay and support staff pay increases, with this point influencing their decision to potentially move away from NJC pay for support staff.
Reward strategy: key considerations
Although the survey shows the appetite continues to be to follow STPCD and NJC, it is important to note that trusts do have options in relation to pay in the future and should consider this as part of a wider reward strategy. For example, you may want to:
- Create your own approach to pay. This could improve recruitment and retention, and whilst the unions may not like a shift away from the national position, that shouldn’t put you off from creating an employment value proposition that really works for your organisation. It is interesting to note that the teacher unions are keen on trusts de-coupling the link between pay and progression, even though that is a key element of STPCD.
- Adopt a hybrid approach, with some reference to STPCD or NJC terms but putting in place more flexibilities that allow you to reward your staff for the work they do in different ways. Any variances from national terms would be set out in the contract of employment. After TUPE, STPCD becomes contractual for teachers. Depending on the wording of the teacher contract, new STPCD terms may not automatically apply, giving you more flexibility to set different terms. The NJC is a collective agreement that transfers, but the agreement is static at the point of transfer which means there is no automatic right to have subsequent editions/revisions to that collective agreement unless you have voluntarily decided to adopt these collective agreements. Our advice is that you should check the wording in your contracts to determine whether subsequent changes to national terms and conditions would be applied automatically.
Conclusion
It will be interesting to see whether the trend for more trusts to have moved away from NJC as opposed to STPCD continues to grow, and to see if more trusts move away from the link between pay and performance, as the survey results indicates that there is some interest in doing this. In any event, it is good practice to regularly review your appraisal systems to ensure they are improving and developing performance which is the purpose.
Your reward strategy should meet your needs. Following the STPCD and NJC is perfectly reasonable, but it’s still important to consider other options that may be appropriate now or sometime in the future as your organisation develops.
Contacts
Emma Hughes
Partner
Helen Varlese
HR Consultant
Key contact
Emma Hughes
Partner
emma.hughes@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2338
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s school leaders survey illustrates rising volume of parental complaints and impact on teachers
Opinion
Can teachers personal and political views amount to misconduct?
Legal Update
Government updates guidance on holiday rules: What employers need to know
Legal Update
How do holiday pay reforms affect the education sector?
Legal Update
Revised Acas Code of Practice on requests for flexible working
Opinion
Settlement agreements: Court of Session finds future claims may be settled
Legal Update
Holiday reforms: What employers need to know
Legal Update
Employment law in 2024: How changes impact education
Legal Update
Backpay for leavers: Employers risk unlawful deduction from wages claims
Legal Update
School staff pay – how are academies responding to national recommendations?
Opinion
Autumn statement 2023 – key take outs for employers
Opinion
Agency cover and strike action
Opinion
Overcoming barriers: Building leadership resilience in MATs
Opinion
Updates in equality – An overview of new regulations
Opinion
Minimum Service Levels and reasonable steps – consultation response
Legal Update
Holiday entitlement and pay: Reforms ahead
Legal Update
A positive duty to prevent sexual harassment
Opinion
Minimum service levels and reasonable steps
Opinion
Are teacher strikes coming to an end?
Legal Update
Parental leave and pay - gender equality?
On-Demand
'School staffing restructures: practical guidance for implementing organisational change' webinar
Legal Update
Updates to the Burgundy Book
Published Article
Third Party Harassment – haven’t we been here before?
On-Demand
Flexible working in schools webinar
Legal Update
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
On-Demand
Industrial action essentials: what you need to know
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Legal Update
Trade unions announce plans to re-ballot members
Legal Update
Widespread industrial action now confirmed for schools
Legal Update
Industrial action and minimum service levels within education
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Guide
FAQs - converting to academy status
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Guide
Recruiting school staff on a budget – top tips
Regardless of the outcome of ballots on industrial action, unless there is drastic change to funding for schools in relation to pay increases, it will be unusual to find any organisational budget that is not impacted by the current economic situation.
Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Press Release
Law firm picks up record breaking sixth Education Investor Award
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Press Release
Thousands take part in virtual careers event to help increase diversity in the legal profession
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.