Are you compliant with AIM Rule 26?
From 28 September 2018, all AIM companies are required to adopt a recognised corporate governance code such as the UK Corporate Governance Code or the QCA Corporate Governance Code and comply with that corporate governance code on a 'comply or explain' basis.
From 28 September 2018, all AIM companies are required to adopt a recognised corporate governance code such as the UK Corporate Governance Code or the QCA Corporate Governance Code and comply with that corporate governance code on a 'comply or explain' basis. Previously, AIM companies had the freedom to choose which code, if any, applies, or set out their own arrangements.
AIM companies should state on their website:
- what code the company has decided will apply;
- how the AIM company complies with that code; and
- if no code has been adopted, detail its current corporate governance arrangements.
This information should be reviewed yearly and the date it was last reviewed should be also be set out on an AIM listed companies website.
The governance codes and the changing world of corporate governance
Over the coming months many government departments will be busy making provision for the UK’s exit from the EU – and, whilst Brexit developments grab the majority of the headlines, separately there is a huge amount of work going on to implement changes to the UK’s corporate governance regime, including capturing AIM listed companies within some of the new arrangements. We only need to recall the media coverage of recent high profile corporate failures, such as Carillion and BHS, to understand why the topic of good governance is high on the political agenda.
The reforms are being introduced through a combination of new statutory reporting requirements and changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code (Code), AIM Rules and QCA.
The 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code
The FRC has published a revised 2018 Code which will apply to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. If the 2018 Code is the recognised code an AIM company has chosen to follow, the revised Code is much shorter, sharper and has fewer provisions than the previous version.
The 2018 Code contains important themes on promoting diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, and enhancing transparency and diversity in a company’s succession pipeline. New provisions include:
- Companies should establish a method for gathering workforce views, using one or a combination of:
- a director appointed from the workforce,
- a formal workforce advisory panel,
- a designated non-executive director.
- A broader role for the remuneration committee.
- Chairs should consider having regularly externally facilitated board evaluations (in FTSE 350 companies, this should happen at least every three years).
- Premium listed companies are required to explain intended actions to consult with shareholders where 20% or more votes are cast against a resolution recommended by the board on executive pay (and other matters).
- Premium listed companies will also be expected to comply with the associated FRC ‘Guidance on Audit Committees’ which provides guidelines for mandatory audit retendering and rotation of auditors. The guidance is based on experiences of audit tenders since the requirement was introduced into the UK Corporate Governance Code in 2012.
QCA Corporate Governance Code
According to QCA research, over half of the 900+ AIM companies have historically chosen adopt the QCA Corporate Governance Code (the QCA Code). A new version of the QCA Code was published on 25 April this year. This caters for small and medium-size firms.
The latest version of the QCA Code addresses the concerns from the Government’s Green Paper consultation on corporate governance reform. New provisions include:
- Ten corporate governance principles;
- Promotes a corporate culture which is based on ethical values and behaviours;
- Promotes stakeholder engagement with shareholders as well as employees, customers, suppliers, regulators and others;
- A change in approach to risk management from reporting risks to actions and outcomes;
- A requirement for companies to disclose and explain any actions or reasons where there are a significant proportion (i.e. 20% and above) of votes against a resolution at a general meeting;
- Suggests that to meet shareholder expectations, companies should consider whether it is appropriate to have a senior independent director (section 4 of the QCA Code); and
- Advises on factors that may hinder directors’ independence.
Conclusion
Given the increased focus of government, stakeholders and society as a whole on the importance of good corporate governance and the need for greater transparency and accountability, AIM companies should be reviewing their existing governance arrangements and preparing to make a comply or exchange statement in respect of their chosen recognised code.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update - DORA
EU Digital Operational Resilience Act: Countdown to comply with the January 2025 deadline
Press Release
Jeanne Kelly recognised in the list of Top 100 people in Irish Tech by the Business Post
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence in insurance: Targeted marketing as a quasi-underwriting function
Opinion - Maternity services
New online system streamlines maternity services at The University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights Data: Strategies for handling cyber attacks and data breaches
Legal Update
Mandatory cybersecurity requirements for businesses in the IOT supply chain
Legal Update
A reflection of FIMA Connect 2024
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Duty of Candour review: Submission to the Department of Health and Social Care
Legal Update
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 – impact of changes implemented on 4 March 2024
Press Release
‘Privacy by design’ approach will help health and care organisations gain public trust in using technology as ICO publishes new guidance
Legal Update
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
Legal Update
ICO consultation on accessing care records: A legal perspective
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence – shaping a sustainable future
Press Release
Spring Budget 2024: Browne Jacobson reaction
Legal Update
Not quite a blanket ban on mobile phones in schools: DfE guidance insights
On-Demand - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Sexual safety in the workplace — how leaders can help to create a sexual safety culture
Legal Update
Progress on the Automated Vehicles Bill
Legal Update
Data protection in higher education: what to expect in 2024
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
Government foreshadows significant savings for public bodies as part of data protection overhaul
Legal Update
ICO consultation on transparency in health and social care
Legal Update
How to mitigate risk in disputes arising from AI use in technology projects
On-Demand
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Opinion
Monitoring workers – ICO guidance
Legal Update
ICO consultation on fertility tracking apps
Published Article
UK: Legal issues with deepfakes
Legal Update
New guidance for employers on subject access requests published by the ICO
Legal Update
Ali Round 2 - High Court gives further guidance on causation and quantum for data breaches
Press Release
Browne Jacobson welcomes former ICO lawyer to support growing UK&I data privacy and tech practice
Legal Update
Update on data protection claims - Austrian Post Case
Press Release
Browne Jacobson launches specialist Ascensus programme for in house lawyers and business leaders
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Legal Update
Cyber security and data breaches
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Legal Update
Update on the Digital Services Act (“DSA”) – Important Dates and Deadlines Looming
Legal Update
Government publishes its proposals for expanding the Scope of the Network and Information Systems Regulations 2018
Legal Update
Protecting children and their data in the online environment
Published Article
Bruce Willis AI and the problem with deepfakes
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.