The two biggest changes in the new safeguarding guidance revolve around sourcing high quality governor and trustee training and the new requirement to carry out online searches for shortlisted candidates.
This article focuses on how and when to carry out online searches. In the coming week we will follow up with everything you need to consider when sourcing high quality governor or trustee training.
So, this is the important paragraph for the safer recruitment change:
“200. In addition, as part of the shortlisting process schools and colleges should consider carrying out an online search as part of their due diligence on the shortlisted candidates. This may help identify any incidents or issues that have happened, and are publicly available online, which the school or college might want to explore with the applicant at interview.”
To understand what we need to do and why, let’s break down that paragraph.
- “should consider” — this is statutory guidance so we know ‘should’ really means must, so unless you have a very good reason to depart from the guidance, you need to follow it
- “as part of the shortlisting process” — we only need to take this step on those we shortlist, not all applicants. This means amending our process to add in this step
- “help identify any incidents or issues” — this is the crux of the ‘why’ and helps us focus on what we are looking for: things said or done that would either harm the reputation of your school or trust or make the candidate unsuitable to work with children.
- “publicly available online” — this is important: we do not need to delve into the private/locked down content of social media accounts, all we are looking for is information that is available to anyone through the usual search engines and websites. We should not be asking candidates to provide us with log in details for social media accounts so we can trawl through that content.
- “might want to explore with the applicant at interview” — note the ‘might’: we can determine that the content is so serious that we opt to bring the recruitment process to an end. If we continue, we put the content to them at interview in the same way we would any issues in a reference or adverse information on a DBS check
It is also worth noting that in the consultation draft guidance the requirement was “schools and colleges should consider carrying out an online search (including social media)”; the underlined words do not feature in the released guidance. Do not read too much into this; I am not sure why these three words were pulled (perhaps it was to avoid confusion with the “publicly available online” part of the paragraph), but it does not stop us reviewing publicly available social media content.
As I have said in other articles, the guidance is a little light on detail (in that it has none), so when it comes to taking reasonable steps to discharge this duty, we need to create the framework ourselves. There are two options: the outsourcing (tech) approach or the more manual, in-house approach.
Outsourcing (tech) approach
Many of you will use digital safer recruitment and onboarding platforms to support you with the various steps already required when it comes to recruiting into schools. Those platforms will be looking to bolt on an offer to support you with carrying out online searches on shortlisted candidates. The market will dictate cost and turnaround times, but one such platform has confirmed they will be able to offer searches from late August for around £20 per person with same-day turn around and include a report on what was found and some level of advice on the seriousness of it.
It will then be for you to review the report/advice and consider next steps, including discussing the findings with the candidate (if appropriate), assessing risk, determining whether to offer the role and whether any risk management steps are required once in post.
In-house approach
This will be more labour-intensive but, on the plus side, comes at no additional cost. Let’s start by looking at who should do this work.
To reduce the risk of discrimination it is sensible for the searches to be carried out by someone unconnected to the recruitment process who can then pass on to the recruitment team only the information that is relevant. This person will need training on how to search and what information to filter out.
When it comes to the ‘how and what’ I recommend starting with a Google search and then reviewing the most popular social media and video sharing platforms, such as LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube. Remember, we are looking for content that does one of two things: calls into question the candidate’s suitability to work with children and/or causes harm to the reputation of your school or trust. That means we are looking for content that evidences inappropriate or offensive behaviour, discrimination, drug or alcohol misuse and inappropriate photos or videos.
Next, we need to consider how far back to look, another area where additional support from guidance would have been welcomed. Over time, the sector will reach a standard approach (as we always do) but until then I recommend that five years as a sensible timeframe.
After the content has been pulled together it should be passed to your recruitment team so they can consider it as part of the wider recruitment process, much is the same way as we do with DBS disclosures. From there, we can either end the process for that candidate or put to them the content we have found and ask them to provide context.
As you know, the guidance comes into force in September, so it is sensible to start work now. Review your recruitment process and add in this new step, consider whether any specific risk assessment needs drafting and whether you want to pull together a set of standard questions and anticipated responses to adverse content so that you can be consistent in how you manage this new requirement. It is also worth looking into the digital onboarding platforms to see how they can support you.
We will be updating our suite of HR and Education Policies to reflect the new guidance, with the redrafted documents ready in late July.
The new documents you need to create for your safer recruitment process feature in our new Safer Recruitment Toolkit.
Contact
Dai Durbridge
Partner
dai.durbridge@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2105
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
Martyn's Law: A closer look at the UK's new proposed anti-terror measures
Legal Update
New High Court case on exclusion reconsiderations
Guide
New guidance for intervention in schools
Legal Update
Silence persists on gender questioning guidance for schools
Online Event
EdCon 2025
Online Event
Managing safeguarding allegations against staff
Legal Update
Attendance management checklist for schools
On-Demand
School attendance: Getting to grips with the new regulations
Legal Update
Ofsted and intervention changes
Legal Update
Interventions and penalties for school non-attendance
Legal Update
New attendance monitoring requirements for schools
Legal Update
What the UK Covid-19 Inquiry means for schools
Legal Update
Changes to attendance requirements for schools
Legal Update
A long period of voluntary child care does not always mean an entitlement to damages
Legal Update
Transgender and gender questioning guidance update
Guide
Rebuilding trust and community: A guide for schools after the recent UK riots
Press Release
King’s Speech 2024: Reaction from Browne Jacobson lawyers
Guide
School INSET days: preparing staff for the 24/25 academic year
Guide
Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSiE) 2024: The main changes and what to do next
Press Release
The Department for Education’s review of the relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) statutory guidance
Legal Update
SEND capacity issues leading to non-compliance
Legal Update
ICO consultation on accessing care records: A legal perspective
Legal Update
Not quite a blanket ban on mobile phones in schools: DfE guidance insights
Legal Update
What does the new gender questioning guidance mean for schools?
Published Article
Legal frameworks for mental health
Legal Update
HXA and YXA : Guidance from the Supreme Court on negligence in failure to remove cases
On-Demand - Shared Insights
The challenges caused by disordered eating in education, health and social care settings
Legal Update
Safeguarding judgements and school intervention
Legal Update
Work experience placements – commendable: have them, and be alive to the risk
Legal Update
School building safety is ‘a critical risk’
On-Demand
Keeping Children Safe in Education 2023 – implementing the key changes
Legal Update
Public Consultation on a Mandatory Reporting Regime for Child Sexual Abuse
Legal Update
Detailing safeguarding information in references- the outcome of Smith v Surridge and others
Legal Update
The Online Safety Bill – what does it mean for schools?
Legal Update
Safeguarding at scale report published
Guide
FAQs - converting to academy status
Legal Update
Protecting children and their data in the online environment
Legal Update
Top three training topics 2022-23
As well as providing day-to-day support to help you focus on managing your settings, we also provide training and professional development on a range of topics to keep you and your staff up-to-date.
Guide
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse - A guide for schools and trusts
Press Release
Law firm picks up record breaking sixth Education Investor Award
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.