Rent arrears post-Covid: What are the landlord’s options?
Since the beginning of the pandemic, landlords and tenants have experienced significant limitations in the way rent arrears could be pursued. We first saw the moratorium on the recovery of Covid related arrears, and more recently we’ve experienced the implementation of the Covid arrears arbitration scheme.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, landlords and tenants have experienced significant limitations in the way rent arrears could be pursued. We first saw the moratorium on the recovery of Covid related arrears, and more recently we’ve experienced the implementation of the Covid arrears arbitration scheme. However, the arbitration scheme closed to new referrals at the end of September and all old methods of rent recovery are now back on the table. We have not been in this position since before March 2020, so it is useful for both landlords and tenants to consider what those options are and the steps landlords can now take. It is important to note that these options are available in respect of all outstanding arrears, whether or not they were previously considered as Covid arrears/protected debt under the temporary Covid measures.
Debt Recovery Proceedings
Landlords can issue a money claim for a judgment ordering the tenant to pay the outstanding debt plus interest and legal costs. A judgment can be enforced through various measures including the seizing of goods or the charging of property owned by the tenant.
Assuming the tenant has no counterclaim and no reason to withhold rent pursuant to a lease, the process of obtaining a judgment may be relatively straight forward for a landlord. A landlord would often be able to obtain a default or summary judgment and avoid reaching trial.
Forfeiture
Most modern commercial leases include a forfeiture clause, enabling a landlord to terminate the lease by reason of non-payment of rent. This can be done by way of a Court application or by simply changing the locks. In the case of non-payment of rent, the landlord is not required to give the tenant any prior notice before terminating the lease.
Tenants can apply to the Court for relief from forfeiture and, if successful, the Court will make an order reinstating the lease. However, this is only available for a tenant if it pays the outstanding arrears and the landlord’s costs. Forfeiture is therefore an effective method of recovering arrears quickly in cases where defaulting tenants wish to remain in occupation. However, this option is less attractive for landlords if the demand for the property would be low. Landlords risk the tenant walking away from the property (and not claiming relief from forfeiture) and being left with a vacant unit and the arrears still outstanding.
It should also be noted that whilst this option appears to be quick and straightforward, there are many potential pitfalls for a landlord and a landlord could find itself to have wrongfully forfeited a lease. We therefore advise to seek legal advice before going down this route.
Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR)
CRAR involves instructing bailiffs to take possession of items within property demised to the tenant equal to the value of the unpaid arrears. Even prior to Covid, CRAR has not been as popular as other enforcement methods due to the extensive limitations on the landlord’s ability to seize goods. It also only relates to principal rent and not service charge or other sums due under the lease.
This option is worth considering if landlords want to recover arrears quickly whilst leaving the lease in full force (and the tenant’s liabilities continuing). In addition, the potential bad publicity arising from a visit by an enforcement agents/bailiff is often enough to make a tenant settle their arrears promptly.
Insolvency
Insolvency procedures are appropriate if a landlord considers a tenant to be unable to pay its debts as they fall due. Non-payment of an undisputed debt (such as rent) would normally give a landlord sufficient grounds to conclude that the tenant is unable to pay and therefore initiate bankruptcy (for individuals) or winding up (for companies) proceedings. This can therefore be an effective method of recovering arrears from tenants that wish to remain solvent.
Other points
The above covers the principal options for landlords in recovering rent arrears. In addition, we would advise landlords to review leases for any other security provisions (including rent deposits and guarantors) which could be used instead of or in addition to these measures.
Many landlords have been out of pocket for over two years now and if the parties have been unable to negotiate a deal during this time, it is likely that we will see landlords using the options detailed above to recover rental arrears. Whether you are a landlord or a tenant, it is therefore important that you are aware of the rent recovery options now available. If you have any queries, our property litigation team can advise further as to which option would be the most appropriate given the circumstances of your case.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson appointed as legal adviser to major housing and care provider Sanctuary
Opinion
Good news for landowners with appeal allowed under the Electronic Communications Code at the Upper Tribunal
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to lead discussions on the future of real estate and infrastructure at this year’s UKREiiF 2024 event
Press Release
Browne Jacobson acquires business of real estate practitioner Paul Taylor Solicitors
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Greater Manchester Combined Authority on its investment in Beryl
Opinion
Regulator warning on future dangers of asbestos
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises First Milk on acquisition of dairy product manufacturer BV Dairy
Opinion
Government consultation launched on contractual controls on land
Legal Update
Restrictive covenants – look before you leap!
Legal Update
COP28 – key outcomes agreed and what they mean for you
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG): Are we ready for it?
Legal Update
The Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise North East Lincolnshire Council on Property Sale
Legal Update
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Platform Housing on landmark deal, creating over 300 affordable and sustainable homes
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
Legal Update
The importance of three magic words
Legal Update
How to negotiate better ‘green’ provisions in your leases
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Building our future town centres: advising local authorities on landmark acquisitions
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Legal Update
Higher-risk buildings – are you ready for 30 September 2023?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise Cubo on investment to support expansion
Legal Update
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
Legal Update
Retirement housing: A solution to our care and housing crises?
Legal Update
Understanding the obligations and implications for open space land and development
Legal Update
Interest from Asia boosts investor confidence in UK commercial real estate
Opinion
The UK market offers the best value for commercial real estate
Opinion
New provisions for higher-risk residential buildings now in force
Legal Update
Regeneration: what role can universities play?
Press Release
UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson joins UKREiiF 2023
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Opinion
‘Awaab’s Law’- a significant amendment to the Social Housing Regulation Bill
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s real estate specialists advise Chesterfield Borough Council on prestigious new development - One Waterside Place
Opinion
Will fixed recoverable costs in housing conditions claims see the light of day?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise High Peak Borough Council on future high street funded acquisition as part of Buxton regeneration vision
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Legal Update
Hillside – the end of drop in applications?
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.