‘Gay cake’ discrimination case ruled inadmissible by ECHR
This case has been rumbling on for over seven years. It relates to a bakery’s refusal to make a cake with the slogan ‘support gay marriage’.
This now infamous case has been rumbling on for over seven years. It relates to a bakery’s refusal to make a cake with the slogan ‘support gay marriage’ on it for Mr Gareth Lee.
Whilst Mr Lee had previously successfully argued that the bakery’s refusal to undertake his request was direct discrimination on the grounds of his sexual orientation at both the County Court and Court of Appeal within Northern Ireland, the Supreme Court then overturned these decisions and held that the Mr Lee’s discrimination claim should be dismissed.
The Supreme Court ruling was related to articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which refer to freedom of religious beliefs and freedom of expression. Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s assessment was that the Christian bakers were not obligated to provide anyone with a product bearing a message that they profoundly disagreed with. Therefore, whilst it would have been discriminatory to refuse to supply Mr Lee with a cake because of his beliefs or sexual orientation, the bakers retained the right to not express a particular opinion that they disagreed with, and so the claim was dismissed.
Mr Lee subsequently took his case to the European Court of Human Rights which also dismissed his case. The Court said that the case was inadmissible due to Mr Lee not invoking his rights under the ECHR at any point during his domestic proceedings in the UK courts. It decided that convention arguments must be raised explicitly before domestic authorities, prior to being bought to the European Courts. This has now seemingly brought to an end a claim that has raised serious questions around religious freedom and discrimination law.
Some will see this as a missed opportunity to consider the discrimination issues at the heart of this case, but nevertheless, this once more demonstrates the subtleties and difficulties behind bringing and defending discrimination claims.
Employers and business alike, need to remain alive to the possibility of discrimination within the workplace, ensuring that they are acting as promptly and thoroughly as possible, all while being assisted by robust policies and procedures.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
What does the Employment Rights Bill mean for employment practices liability insurance?
Opinion
Beyond the Bill: Exploring the horizon of new employment rights and proposed measures
Legal Update
Labour’s employment law reforms: Employment Rights Bill unveiled
Legal Update
Expanding the role of school attendance mentors
Online Event
Shaping a culture of respect and safety: Preventing sexual harassment in our schools
Online Event
Managing safeguarding allegations against staff
Online Event
How schools can grapple with new employment law to thrive in a new era
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises fire suppression manufacturer DAS Fire on its acquisition by Alpine Fire
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises UK climbing operator on sale to Belgian investment firm
Legal Update
Organisational approaches to ESG matters
Legal Update
Balancing acts: Navigating the complex risks in adult social care provision
Legal Update
What the UK Covid-19 Inquiry means for higher education providers
Opinion
New anticipatory duty to prevent sexual harassment at work: final EHRC guidance published
Opinion
Employment tribunal case shines light on mistaken customer communications
Press Release
Browne Jacobson launches new HR services offering in health and social care
Press Release
Browne Jacobson and CBI roundtable explores how to finance public infrastructure post-PFI
Opinion
Navigating the new norms of flexible working and reasonable adjustments
Legal Update
Hybrid working, the right to flexible working and how to make it work for public sector employers
Press Release
Comments on the publication of Universities UK’s (UUK) report
Press Release
An interview with HSBC’s ex-commercial manager
Opinion
HMRC score on employment status: Football referees may be employees
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises global digital transformation services provider on PE investment and acquisition of US and Hungary-based commerce consultancy
Legal Update
Supreme Court re-instates injunction in Tesco fire and re-hire case
Legal Update
A balancing act: Navigating between positive action and discrimination in the workplace
Legal Update
CQC publish National review of maternity services in England
Press Release
Leading the conversation on DEI in the food & drink industry: celebrating the contribution of women
Legal Update
Employment update: September 2024
Opinion
English Nationalism not a protected belief under the Equality Act
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Contract management and performance
Published Article
Hybrid working: The right to flexible working and how to make it work for public sector employers
Legal Update
Mitigating the £6.2bn black hole: Are councils maximising these resources well enough?
Legal Update
ASA bans “misleading” Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon’s Den Star
Opinion
What does the right to switch off mean for employers?
Opinion
Choose your words wisely: Balancing inclusivity and employees’ beliefs at work
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Howard Farms on phased sale of Mulberry Logistics Park site
Opinion
What to expect from Labour’s employment law reforms: Key takeaways from The King’s Speech 2024
Opinion
New proactive duty to prevent sexual harassment: is your organisation ready?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises management at Metric Search on BGF investment
Published Article
The future of devolution: How a Labour majority could redefine local powers in England
