Exam appeals guidance released
The Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) this week published the appeals guidance for grades awarded this summer.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication.
The Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) this week published the appeals guidance for grades awarded this summer. We will shortly be releasing further information on the appeals process and data protection considerations, as well as running a webinar on 7 July, but in advance of that, here are three key points to take away from the guidance.
Firstly, there are two stages to the appeals process. The stage one centre review is about checking that your centre’s procedures in arriving at the grade have been followed and that no administrative errors have occurred during the process (e.g. between two students with similar names). The second stage is where students who are still unhappy following the outcome of the stage one centre review, can request that the centre submits their appeal to the awarding organisation. It’s at this second stage that the awarding body will consider appeal arguments around academic judgement and mitigating circumstances.
Secondly, the timescales are tight. There is a deadline for students applying to higher education, who did not attain their first choice, of 16 August to make a centre review request and 23 August for a stage two (awarding organisation appeal) request to centres. There is more time for non-priority appeals with deadlines of 3 September and 17 September respectively for students. This does mean that centres are going to need to ensure their processes are robust and records are kept of students that are requesting reviews to ensure none are missed.
Finally, on stage two appeals that relate to the exercise of academic judgement, which can either be in the form of the evidence selected or the decision on the grade itself, the question for the awarding body will be whether the decision was unreasonable, not whether another proposed grade in the appeal was reasonable. This is a relatively high threshold and does mean that appeals on this basis will be difficult, albeit not impossible, for students to succeed on.
Contact
Philip Wood
Senior Associate
philip.wood@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2274
You may be interested in...
Online Event
Handling parent complaints against staff: Panel discussion
Online Event
Pupillage open evening
Press Release
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill: Comments from education lawyers
Legal Update
School exclusions case confirms ‘substance over form’ is key
Press Release
Browne Jacobson continues strategic expansion in Wales with new corporate partner
Legal Update
Stark increase in rates of school suspensions and exclusions
Online Event
Embracing AI to improve school governance
Legal Update
Navigating workplace sexual harassment laws during the festive season
Press Release
Comments on the latest SEND tribunal statistics
On-Demand
Managing safeguarding allegations against staff
Guide - PFI expiry
PFI expiry guidance for schools
Opinion
Revolutionising the Workforce: Impact of Get Britain Working White Paper
Legal Update
The power of storytelling (and curiosity)
Online Event
Supporting universities to meet their financial duties
Podcast - #EdInfluence
#EdInfluence podcast (series 4): In conversation with inspiring leaders
Press Release - School leaders survey
Browne Jacobson’s latest School Leaders Survey illustrates need for better SEND guidance as exclusions rise
Press Release
New hires at Browne Jacobson will support schools with data compliance amid enhanced ICO scrutiny
Opinion
Balancing employer flexibility and employee rights
Legal Update - School leaders survey
School Leaders Survey Autumn 2024: The results are in
Legal Update - Be Connected (schools)
Be Connected: Schools and academy trusts November 2024
On-Demand
Shaping a culture of respect and safety: Preventing sexual harassment in our schools
Legal Update
Funding withdrawn for trusts and academy conversions
Legal Update
Top five takeaways for schools on the Employment Rights Bill
Legal Update
New High Court case on exclusion reconsiderations
Legal Update
Building an inclusive workplace: Strategies for attracting and retaining disabled talent
On-Demand
How schools can grapple with new employment law to thrive in a new era
Legal Update
Five steps to turn the tide on Subject Access Requests
Guide
New guidance for intervention in schools
Legal Update
Silence persists on gender questioning guidance for schools
Online Event
EdCon 2025
Press Release
Browne Jacobson comments on the government's announcement of tuition fee rises
Legal Update - Be Connected (higher education)
Be Connected: Higher education Autumn 2024
Legal Update
Supreme Court clarifies public authority liability: Police duty of care in negligence cases
Published Article
The pressure on western universities to divest in fossil fuels: Navigating legal complexities and environmental responsibilities
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
Labour’s employment law reforms: Employment Rights Bill unveiled
Legal Update
Expanding the role of school attendance mentors
Legal Update
Working together to support student wellbeing
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act delay: What’s the impact for higher education institutions?
Legal Update
Ten practical tips for universities handling judicial review cases
