The aim of this briefing is to provide you with an update on the progress of the Procurement Bill and how it is progressing through the final stages of the Parliamentary process.
On the 11 September 2023 the House of Lords considered the House of Commons’ amendments to the Bill. This stage is often referred to as the “ping-pong” stage where amendments go back and forth between the two houses until an agreement has been reached. So, the question every procurement professional is now asking is are they still playing legislation ping-pong? The short answer is yes, but the issues on the table have significantly narrowed and the game may soon be over!
Some significant issues were debated, and motions put forward by the Lords, which had the potential to de-rail the implementation of the Bill and set the process back many months. In particular, there was fierce criticism by some members of the treatment of the NHS in the Procurement Bill who were seeking to re-include the NHS in the definition of the contracting authority and the scope of the Act. Ultimately, the amendment to the motion was not agreed.
In light of the human rights abuses against the Uyghur people in China, the House of Lords debated the inclusion of additional exclusion grounds to reject suppliers whose supply chains are involved in organ harvesting. The Lords agreed this amendment; however, the Commons subsequently disagreed with this amendment (14 September). This was on the basis that it is unnecessary to have a specific discretionary exclusion ground for involvement in forced organ harvesting as this is already covered by the general professional misconduct exclusion ground.
No further dates have been announced to discuss further amendments, we will report on these as they are scheduled.
Discover more
You may be interested in...
Legal Update
What impact will the Procurement Act 2023 have on resolving contractual disputes?
Legal Update - PFI expiry
A first of many? PFI company seeks Restructuring Plan
Published Article
The Post Office Horizon IT Scandal: How should organisations react when IT systems go wrong?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson appoints Jan Cumming as legal director to Government practice
Online Event - Procurement Act
Procurement reform webinar - are you ready?
Legal Update - PFI expiry
PFI handback: ‘Handback Condition’ limitations, disputes and solutions
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Provider Selection Regime - how will it work in practice?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
PPN 01/24: Carbon reduction contract schedule
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Landmark judgment in OCS Group UK Limited v Community Health Partnerships Limited
Press Release
Browne Jacobson to advise East London Waste Authority on major waste programme
Legal Update
Braceurself Ltd v NHS England 2024: Court of Appeal procurement case decision
Legal Update
UK falls to lowest position for corruption – so what’s going wrong?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
The evolution of sub-contracting under the Procurement Act 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement reform: Making poor performance a thing of the past
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act: the even lighter touch regime
On-Demand
Provider Selection Regime – change is coming, what does it mean for you?
Published Article
Infrastructure and social value in public contracts – making it concrete
On-Demand - Procurement Act
Procurement Reform - Change is coming, are you ready?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill: Competitive flexible procedure, how will this work in practice?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Act 2023: Getting Ready for Reform - the countdown is on!
Legal Update
PPN 08/23: using standard contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advising the Welsh Government on the delivery of significant number of renewable energy projects
Legal Update
Guidance on contract changes: James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council
Legal Update
Case summary: the importance of bringing a procurement claim within the appropriate time limits
Legal Update - Procurement Act
New obligations for Welsh public bodies on social partnership and socially responsible procurement
Legal Update
Challenging procurement decisions by way of Judicial Review - the key principles
Legal Update
Australia and New Zealand Free Trade Agreement drives changes to the Public Procurement rules
Published Article
Amendments to Procurement Bill: Navigating sanctions and supplier bans and impact on the construction sector
On-Demand
'Getting ready to reform – preparing for the new Procurement Bill' webinar
Legal Update
Changes to the Standard Selection Questionnaire effective from 1 April 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Automatic suspension and procurement law
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update - Public matters newsletter
Public matters - February 2023
Legal Update - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Guide - Procurement Act
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
Published Article
Reaching cloud nine? Public procurement for cloud-based services
Opinion - Procurement Act
Procurement Bill - what’s new in 2022?
Legal Update
CCGs’ conduct “sufficiently serious” for award of damages in High Court procurement case
This case provides a reminder to contracting authorities that whilst the bar for an award of damages in procurement cases is high, following the Supreme Court ruling in Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] 1 WLR 1373, it is not insurmountable when a contracting authority has acted with disregard to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCRs). There is also further guidance as to the use of frameworks